Clinical analysis of alkaline ionized water for stomach problems

Clinical analysis of alkaline ionized water for stomach problems:

Placebo controlled double blind tests by Hirokazu Tashiro, Tetsuji Hokudo, Hiromi Ono, Yoshihide Fujiyama, Tadao Baba (National Ohkura Hospital, Dept. of Gastroenterology; Institute of Clinical Research, Shiga University of Medical Science, Second Dept. of Internal Medicine)

The outcomes of of alkaline ionized water for abdominal issues was analyzed by placebo controlled double blind tests. Overall innumerable advancements using high pH ionized water marked above those of the placebo controlled group, and its effect proved [turned out to be considerably improved particularly in slight symptoms of chronic diarrhea and abdominal complaints in scenarios of general malaise. The high pH ionized water team didn’t get interrupted during course of the study, nor did it show serious ill impacts nor abnormal data. It was affirmed that high pH ionized water is safer and a lot more effective than placebos.

Summary

Results of high pH ionized water on stomach issues was clinically analyzed by double blind tests using clean water as placebo. Overall improvement rate was improved for alkaline ionized water team than placebo group and the former proved to be considerably more beneficialthan the opposite especially in cases of minor symptoms. Examining improvement rate for every case of chronic diarrhea, constipation and abdominal complaints, the high pH ionized water group turned out to be more effectivethan the placebo team for chronic diarrhea, and abdominal complaints. The check was halted in one case of chronic diarrhea, among placebo group due to exacerbation, whereas alkaline ionized water team did not stop testing without serious ill impacts or abnormal information in all cases. It was affirmed that alkaline ionized water is a lot more effective than clean water versus chronic diarrhea, stomach complaints and overall improvement rate (relief of abdominal complaints) and generally safer than clean water.

Introduction

Since the approval of alkaline ionized water electrolyzers by Pharmaceutical Affairs Law in 1966 for its antacid effect and improvements against gastrointestinal disorders as well as hyperchylia, indigestion, abnormal gastrointestinal fermentation and chronic diarrhea, they’ve been extensively used among patients. However, medical and scientific analysis of their validity is not established.

In our study, we tended to examine clinical results of alkaline ionized water on gastrointestinal disorders across several symptoms in varied facilities. Particularly, we studied safety and usefulness of high pH ionized water by doubleblind tests using clean water as a management group.

Test subjects and ways

163 patients (34 men, 129 women, age 21 to 72, average 38.6 years old) of indigestion, irregular gastrointestinal fermentation (with irregular gas emission and rugitus) and abdominal complaints caused by irregular dejection (chronic diarrhea, or constipation) were tested as subjects with thier permission. Placebo controlled double blind tests were conducted using high pH ionized water and clean water at multiple facilities. An alkaline ionized pH water electrolyzer sold commercially was put in with a pump driven calcium dispenser in every subjects homes.

Tested alkaline ionized water had pH at nine.five and calcium concentration at 30ppm. Each subject in placebo cluster used a water purifier that has the same look of the electrolyzer and produced clean water.

The tested equipment was randomly assigned by a controller who scaled off the key code that was stored safely until the tests were completed and until the seal was opened again.

Water samples got to each subject in the amount of 200ml within the morning with a total of 500 ml or more per day for a month. Before and after tests, blood, urine and stool were tested and a log was kept on the subjective symptoms, bowel movements and accent symptoms. Test results were analyzed according to the log and test data.

Test Results

1. Symptom

Among 163 tested subjects, alkaline ionized water team included 84 and placebo cluster seventy nine. Background factors like gender, age and basal disorders failed to contribute to important distinctions within the results.

2. Overall improvement rate

As to overall improvement rate of abdominal complaints, the alkaline ionized water group had two scenarios of outstanding improvement. (2.5%), 26 scenarios of fair improvement (32.1%), 36 cases of minor improvement (44.4%), 13 situations of no change (16%) and 4 situations of exacerbation (4.9%), whereas the placebo group exhibited 4 (5.2%), 19 (24.7%), 27 (35.1%), 25 (32.5%) and 2 scenarios (2.6%) for the same category.

Comparison between high pH ionized water and placebo teams didn’t reveal any important difference at the extent of fivepercent significance per the Wilcoxon test, though the alkaline ionized water team turned out to be considerably more effectivethan the placebo team at the extent of pH value of 0.22.

Examining overall improvement rates by a 7,2 test (with no adjustment for continuity) between the beneficialand non-beneficialteams, the high pH ionized water team had 64 (seventy ninep.c) of beneficialcases and seventeen cases (21p.c) of non effectivecases, whereas the placebo cluster had fifty (sixty four.9percent) and 27 (35.onepercent) scenarios respectively. The result indicated that the alkaline ionized water team was significantly more effectivethan the placebo cluster at the amount of pH of 0.0.48.

Looking solely at 83 slight situations of abdominal complaints, overall improvement rate for the alkaline ionized water group (45 scenarios) was composed of eleven situations (242%) of truthful improvement, twenty two scenarios (48.9percent) of minor improvement, seventeen scenarios (44.sevenpercent) of no change and three scenarios (64.9%) of exacerbation, whereas the placebo team (38 scenarios) had 3 (7.eightp.c), seventeen (forty four.7percent), seventeen (forty four.7p.c) and 1 (2.6%) scenarios for the same class.

The alkaline ionized water group was significantly more beneficialthan the placebo team in keeping with the comparison between the groups (pH = zero.033).

3. Improvement rate by basal symptom

Basal symptoms were divided into chronic diarrhea, constipation and abdominal complaints (dyspepsia) and overall improvement rate was evaluated for every subject to study the impacts of alkaline ionized water.

In case of chronic diarrhea, the alkaline ionized water cluster resulted in ninety four.1% of beneficialcases and five.9p.c of non effectivescenarios. The placebo cluster came up with 64,7% beneficialand thirty five.threep.c non effective.

These results indicate the alkaline ionized water group proved to be significantly more effectivethan the placebo team. In the case of slighter chronic diarrhoea, comparison between groups revealed thatthe  high pH ionized water group is significantly more effectivethan the placebo team (pH=0.015).

In case of constipation, the high pH ionized water team consisted of eighty.5percent of effectiveand nineteen.5% of non effectivecases, whereas the placebo team resulted in 73.3p.c effectiveand twenty six.3 non effective. As to abdominal complaints (dyspepsia), the alkaline ionized water cluster had eighty five.sevenpercent of beneficialand 14.3% non effectivescenarios while the placebo team showed forty seven.1p.c and sixty two.nine% respectively.

The high pH ionized water group proved to be considerably more beneficialthan the placebo group (pH=0.025).

4. Safety

Since one case of chronic diarrhea, in the placebo cluster saw exacerbation, the test was halted. There was no such scenarios in the alkaline ionized water group. Fourteen scenarios of accessory symptoms, 8 in the high pH ionized water group and 6 in the placebo cluster, were observed, none of which were serious. thirty one out of 163 situations (sixteen in the alkaline ionized water group, 15 in the placebo cluster) exhibited fluctuation in check data, though the high pH ionized water team failed to have any problematic fluctuations compared to the placebo group. Two situations in the placebo team and one case in the high pH ionized water cluster have seen K value of serum climb up and resume to traditional value once re-testing which indicates the value changes were temporary.

Conclusion

As a result of double blind clinical tests of high pH ionized water and clean water, alkaline ionized water was proved to be a lot of effectivethan clean water against chronic diarrhea, abdominal complaints (dyspepsia) and overall improvement rate (relief from abdominal complaints).

Conjointly, safety of high pH ionized water was confirmed, which clinically verifies its usefulness.

About the Author

Post a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Top